Deconstructing First Principles of Payments: How Can Stablecoins Unlock a Trillion-Dollar Opportunity?
Original Article Title: A First Principles Breakdown of the Crypto Payments Stack
Original Article Author: @proofofnathan
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: This article explores the huge potential of stablecoins in the payment space, suggesting that stablecoins will surpass traditional payment systems due to being more efficient, faster, and cheaper. The article introduces the various layers of the crypto payments stack, from consumer wallets and payment providers to the financial integration layer, such as Banking as a Service and over-the-counter trading platforms. The application of stablecoins has not only boosted financial firms' profits but also improved user experience, driving the adoption of crypto payments. Ultimately, the core role of stablecoins in crypto payments will drive nearly all blockchains towards the payments space.
The following is the original content (slightly rephrased for better readability):
It's not just because stablecoins' supply has exceeded $230 billion, or that Circle has filed for an IPO, or that I often say, "It's already here."
It's because stablecoins are fundamentally disrupting the payments industry, and this disruption will continue at an exponential pace.
My core thesis is simple: Stablecoins will replace traditional payment methods because they are better, faster, and cheaper.

However, "payment" is a broad concept. Today's payment system is still dominated by traditional payment networks, banks, and fintech companies, each playing different roles in the payment structure of Web2.
While stablecoins offer a more efficient, highly available alternative, today's payment stack is gradually replicating the complexity of Web2 systems—this is why it is necessary for us to break it down.
Currently, hundreds of companies are building stablecoin-based payment networks or establishing complementary infrastructure alongside them.
@Dberenzon put together a fantastic chart that breaks down the on-chain payment ecosystem into nine different subdomains, and below is that chart.

What Dmitriy provides is a deep and somewhat technical breakdown, while entities like Pantera in "The Trillion-Dollar Opportunity" take a more macro view, dividing the entire payment system into four layers.

In this article, I attempt to reframe the payment stack in a crypto-native, first principles-based manner. Of course, the classification methods proposed by individuals such as Dmitriy and Pantera remain highly valuable, providing a good framework from another perspective.
For a better understanding, I see the structure of the entire payment stack as a vertical path—where the top is one type of user and the bottom is another type of user. And I believe the ultimate achievement of the payment stack is to allow billions of users to seamlessly access the crypto system, even unknowingly.
Crypto Payments Stack
Starting from first principles, a stablecoin is a token on the blockchain that represents a fiat currency unit, with the most common being pegged to the US Dollar.
There are several types of stablecoins, including:
· Fiat-backed, such as USDT
· Crypto-backed, such as DAI
· Synthetic, such as USDe
The most dominant type is fiat-backed stablecoins. These stablecoins are backed by highly liquid assets such as US Treasuries, cash, and equivalents, held in reserves by custodians at a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, at the bottom layer of the payment stack, traditional banks and payment systems still exist.
As mentioned earlier, stablecoins are disrupting the traditional payment system because they are better, faster, and cheaper. This has not only increased the profit margins of fintech and payment companies but has also provided end-users with a better experience. Therefore, from a user perspective, consumers are at the topmost layer of the payment stack.
In conclusion, the current payment stack can be roughly understood as follows:
(An illustrative diagram will be shown here)

Now, let's look at the most core use case in the payment stack. We have seen that one of the highest user retention use cases in the crypto industry is actually the "off-ramp"—converting cryptocurrency to fiat currency.
While the concept of an "on-ramp" (converting fiat into crypto) is also common, the predominant need has always been the ability to easily spend crypto assets, especially stablecoins.
In the payment stack we are building, on/off-ramp service providers sit right in the middle.

Above the on/off-ramp service providers is a section primarily focused on consumers or tools that support consumer usage, which I refer to as the **"Consumer Serving Layers".
Below them — from on/off-ramp to traditional banks — lies the part that integrates stablecoins into the traditional financial system, which I call the "Financial Integration Layers".
It is worth noting that the number of layers in the Consumer Serving Layers is much greater than in the Financial Integration Layers.
The reason is simple: building a Financial Integration Layer often requires licensing, compliance processes, and highly structured operations. Consumer Serving Layers can directly leverage the services and contractual relationships established in the lower layers to rapidly build on top of them.
Of course, there may be other modules in the Consumer Serving Layers, but here I have only selected the key parts in the entire payment stack that have clear functionality, well-defined dependencies, and a crucial role to explain.
Consumer Serving Layers

From the consumer's perspective, the first step into the crypto payment stack is a wallet.
A wallet is not just a tool for storing crypto assets; it is actually the gateway to the entire "save, spend, earn" experience.
Modern wallets usually have various functions, such as debit card payments, virtual bank accounts, peer-to-peer transfers, etc., designed to meet users' diverse scenario needs.
There are already a wide range of wallet products on the market, some targeting global users and others focusing on specific regional markets.
Building a wallet is actually very complex
It involves integrating multiple services and requires high-level security measures to prevent hacking attacks.
Therefore, many teams choose to rely on Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) providers. These WaaS solutions have been audited, battle-tested, and usually integrate infrastructure such as on/off-ramp services, issuer interfaces, and more.
In order to get consumer wallets truly "running," they also need to rely on various B2B stablecoin payment service providers, with key modules including:
· Invoice services: allow users to invoice their employer in crypto or fiat, with the platform receiving the payment, converting on demand, and then depositing into the user's wallet.
· Payment streaming: as companies globalize and employees are distributed worldwide, these platforms support regular stablecoin payroll, especially useful in countries where local bank access is not available.
· Card issuers: as user spending shifts from cash to electronic payments, encrypted cards become increasingly important. These issuing entities usually partner with Visa, Mastercard, enabling wallets to have the ability to "swipe card" for real-world transactions.
Compliance is also crucial, and to safeguard user funds, most platforms integrate comprehensive compliance tools at the wallet layer, including:
· KYC/AML (Know Your Customer/Anti-Money Laundering)
· On-chain fraud detection services
These compliance service providers play a significant role in the consumer service layer, both ensuring platform compliance and enhancing user trust.
Additionally, peer-to-peer payment networks are also part of the consumer layer. These networks bypass traditional payment pathways, directly connecting users and merchants for encrypted and fiat transaction exchanges.
P2P payments are widely adopted in some developing countries, but compared to the overall payment stack, they are less efficient with smaller transaction volumes, serving more as a complementary solution to traditional channels. Finally, the on/off-ramp aggregators sit at the bottom of the consumer service layer.
They consolidate multiple on/off-ramp services into a single unified API, allowing wallet developers to automatically choose solutions with faster speeds, lower fees, and better regional coverage, enhancing user experience.
Financial Integration Layers

Transitioning to Financial Integration Layers brings us to the "backbone" of the entire crypto payment stack.
In the traditional payment stack, the part we are about to discuss is usually referred to as the Aggregation & Orchestration Layer. However, I believe that the reason it can "aggregate" and "orchestrate" is because it sits on top of a robust and intricate infrastructure. Therefore, this layer should be placed at the very top of the financial integration layer.
Below the Aggregation & Orchestration Layer lies the core support for the entire fund flow, with the following three layers being key foundational modules that are frequently aggregated and orchestrated:
1. Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) Providers
These platforms offer modular financial infrastructure that allows companies to integrate services such as virtual bank accounts, card issuance, payment channels, and more.
They typically assist clients in completing compliance, back-office settlement, and other processes, enabling businesses to provide quasi-banking services in their products without holding a financial license themselves.
2. Over-the-Counter (OTC) Trading Platforms
OTC platforms specialize in handling large-volume transactions, serving as a bridge for companies that cannot directly interface with major exchanges or liquidity providers.
They can swiftly and efficiently facilitate bi-directional exchanges between stablecoins and fiat currencies, greatly simplifying the settlement process for large trades.
3. Liquidity Providers
Working closely with OTC platforms, they ensure sufficient fund availability and timely settlement for transactions globally. These institutions shield the complexity of fund movement between crypto and fiat currencies, allowing various applications to execute coin swaps, payments, and other operations through simple API calls.
Many companies are unwilling to self-custody millions of dollars' worth of stablecoins or other crypto assets. Therefore, custody service providers have become an indispensable foundational component. They offer regulated, insured, institutional-grade secure custody solutions, serving as the trust anchor for almost all crypto payment applications.
In the payment stack, Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) play a critical role, especially in the financial integration stage. They facilitate large-scale fiat-to-stablecoin settlements through liquidity provider integrations and mint/redeem services. These exchanges typically hold a portion of stablecoins and cash reserves to ensure smooth fund transfers for both parties.
At the bottom layer are the Mint & Redeem services, which form the foundation of the entire payment stack. Stablecoins exist because someone "mints" them, and others "redeem" them.
· Tether (USDT) operates its minting and redemption mechanism based on whitelisted partners who directly receive user bank transfers and exchange them for an equivalent amount of USDT.
·Circle (USDC) provides minting and redemption services through Circle Mint for companies that have completed KYB (Know Your Business) verification.
Final Summary: A Comprehensive Payment Stack Overview
The payment stack is dynamic and highly interconnected. Each layer relies on the tools, services, and providers behind it. Overall, the cryptocurrency payment stack looks like this:

Stablecoin-driven payments represent one of the most influential and easily adoptable real-world use cases for cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin as a store of value. @PlasmaFDN is a blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin payments and is well-positioned in this area. However, I expect that almost all blockchains will eventually pivot towards stablecoins and the payments space.
To achieve this goal, they must rethink their payment stack—simply being EVM-compatible is no longer sufficient.

In summary, stablecoins indeed present a trillion-dollar opportunity, and those who play key roles in the payment stack will reap the greatest rewards.

Source: Original Article Link
You may also like

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.




